|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 11, 2002
|
| |
Lionetti v. Lionetti, FA940138901S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Husband did not pay children's unreimbursed medical expenses, as ordered, but wife did not timely present bills to husband, so husband was ordered to pay expenses, but was not found in contempt, and attorney fee question was reserved.
|
|
| |
Maloney Indus. v. Wayfarer Aviation, CV990365663S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court granted motion for summary judgment to dismiss unfair trade practices statute claim by aircraft service business common stock buyer against seller; neither party was engaged in business of selling businesses.
|
|
| |
McKinney v. Harris, CV980578305S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pasquini v. Wilkinson, CV010182838,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court found that home buyers entered into transaction knowing of water problem on property, and received credit at closing to offset costs of remedying water problem. Judgment was entered in favor of home sellers.
|
|
| |
Piteau v. Horanieh, CV000598361S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In medical malpractice suit, there appeared to be no requirement that "apparent authority" be specifically pleaded in addition to agency, since the facts supporting the claim were sufficiently set forth. Thus, there was a genuine issue of fact.
|
|
| |
Richardson v. Warden-Cheshire, CV990421817S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant did not meet his burden of proof on alleged claims; any conflict of interest between defendant's counsel and former client was knowingly waived.
|
|
| |
Rivera v. Stop & Shop Holding, CV970349258S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Judgment was entered for a company in an injured party's personal injury action; the court found claims that security guards beat injured party in a parking lot after the injured party was caught shoplifting to be unpersuasive.
|
|
| |
Rottier v. Town of Guilford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010447054SX23,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Rudy's Limousine Serv. v. State DOT, CV010509165S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, April 11, 2002, Decided , April 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the limousine corporation had obtained permits for intrastate licenses and sought to obtain additional ones under the statute in the proceeding, it could not attack the statute's constitutionality in the same proceeding.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback