 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. Comm'r of Corr., CV030824589,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, March 3, 2005, Decided , March 3, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his conviction of conspiracy to commit kidnapping, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-94 and 53a-48, was denied, because defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel adequately cross-examined a disputed witness under the circumstances of the case.
|
|||||
| Tine v. Colello, CV020100135S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 3, 2005, Decided , March 3, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court refused to address claim that a college failed to provide instruction in a professional manner, and no exceptions allowing review applied. However, because the college retained tuition for instruction it did not provide, it was unjustly enriched, and an interest rate on a note which violated Conn. Gen. Stat. § 37-4 was unenforceable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
