 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lent v. D'Antonio, HHDX04CV054034643S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT HARTFORD, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Home owners' proposed amendment was granted, as (1) it did not present different fact situation, but pled specific ways in which they claimed that builder's plans were inadequate, which had been previously alleged only generally; and (2) any prejudice to builder in permitting the amendment was outweighed by the prejudice to owners in denying it.
|
|||||
| Marshall v. Marshall, FSTFA054007455S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super Ct. 11-11 motion to clarify and for articulation of a divorce judgment and financial orders was denied where paragraphs were not in conflict and where the court had retained continuing jurisdiction over the issues presented. Property division was a matter that had to be resolved before an appellate court.
|
|||||
| Plato Assocs., LLC v. Envtl. Compliance Servs., CV076001398,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As property owner did not allege what intended improvements to its property could not be completed due to claimed deficiency of environmental services company's environmental site assessment, seven-year statute of limitations involving suits against professional engineers, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584a, did not apply and owner's suit was time-barred.
|
|||||
| Snake Meadow Club, Inc. v. Town of Killingly, CV074006068S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM AT PUTNAM, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No authority required town's tax assessor to recognize club's separate agreement with lessee to treat lessee's cell tower as personal property for tax assessment purposes; it was Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-64(a), not agreement, that controlled taxation and dictated tax on cell tower be assessed against club, the property's owner, rather than lessee.
|
|||||
| Tonry v. Tonry, FA054016020,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a husband's failure to pay back taxes resulted in money being taken by the state and federal governments from the wife's refunds, the husband was ordered to pay that money to the wife as well as an additional 10 percent from the time the wife's refunds were taxed, in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 37-3a.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
