|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 3, 2000
|
| |
|
| |
Bailey v. Warden, CV 970574158,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Cavendish-Pell v. Howell, CV 960153146,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant did not show that she was entitled to summary judgment since there were genuine issues of fact about oral agreement, defendant's partial performance of alleged contract, and about existence of violation of CUTPA.
|
|
| |
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Vignos, CV 980168967,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Power company alleged the elements of a cause of action for unjust enrichment sufficiently to plead a cause of action in an action to recover unpaid electric bills from defendants, owners of a residential dwelling.
|
|
| |
Ex rel. Jesse E., (NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL),
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: It was in the best interest of the child to terminate his parents' custody rights since his mother was mentally ill and unable to care for the child, and his father abandoned the child.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fields v. Housing Auth. of Stamford, CV 990170592,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Ford v. Ford, FA 990169979S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Gant v. Gant, FA 990363030,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Herbert v. Herbert, FA 990155947S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 3, 2000, Decided , March 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In dispute over whether a decree of legal separation was still valid, court ordered an evidentiary hearing to determine whether marital relations were resumed.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
