|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 5, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Hayes v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., CV020100267,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parishioner's motion to strike defendants' special defense based on the First Amendment was granted as to claims arising from sexual abuse by a priest, because the negligence claims did not intrude upon the free exercise of religion.
|
|
| |
Korner v. Korner, FA020731932,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based upon the fact that a marriage had irretrievably broken down, the marriage was dissolved; the husband was ordered to pay alimony where the court found a difference in income of approximately five times his wife's income.
|
|
| |
Lombardi v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., CV010167187S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A motion to set aside the verdict was denied as there was evidence upon which the jury could reasonably have based its verdict for non-economic damages for the injuries, pain, suffering, scarring, and memory loss of the 80-year-old victim.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nelligan v. Norwich R.C. Diocese, CV020099218S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As there were allegations of abuse as to approximately four percent of all priests, it could not be said that such conduct was a digression from duty, as a matter of law. Thus, the issue of respondeat superior was not subject to a motion to strike.
|
|
| |
Olney v. Olney, FA030101035,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a marriage had broken down irretrievably, a decree was entered dissolving the marriage and incorporating orders. The wife's birth name was restored.
|
|
| |
Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, FA960537581S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A mother's motion to remove a guardian ad litem (GAL) from representation of a minor child was denied; the mother failed to show that the GAL's continued representation of the child would prejudice the mother's action seeking custody.
|
|
| |
Soliwoda v. Soliwoda, FA030732255,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a husband lowered his earnings by reducing his working hours from 80 to 45 per week and by limiting his efforts to maintain his business's viability, his wife was awarded 75 percent of equity in family home and he was given 25 percent.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback