 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bojadzic v. Bojadzic, FSTFA064008662S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taking into consideration the factors in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-82, alimony was granted in favor of a wife who had immigrated from Kosovo, had limited command of the English language, had poor prospects for future work, and had been miserably treated by her husband and her husband's family.
|
|||||
| Corcoran v. German Soc. Soc'y Frohsinn, Inc., AC 26720,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court may consider the Landsdowne Swim Club factors in determining a claim under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-64, but only insofar as they pertained to the overarching test for a public accommodation. Because a trial court's analysis in a gender discrimination claim brought against a club was not so constrained, it was improper.
|
|||||
| Debrizzi v. Monetary Funding Group, Inc., CV064014041,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in a favor of a lender on two outstanding loans after a corporate borrower's special defense of usury failed due to the fact that the loans fit within exemptions to the usury statute set out in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 37-9(4); treble damages were denied as intent required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-564 was not shown.
|
|||||
| Di Teresi v. Stamford Health Sys., FSTCV065001340S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a patient was allegedly raped by a nurse's assistant, allegations that the hospital intentionally withheld information, delayed reporting the rape, and withheld treatment sufficiently stated a claim under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110g of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act; therefore, the hospital's motion to strike this claim was denied.
|
|||||
| Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams, CV074024256S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney who violated Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 7.2(c), and Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(4) was permitted to obtain dismissal of a disciplinary matter by fulfilling certain conditions because he was remorseful and acknowledged the wrongfulness of his conduct.
|
|||||
| Driska v. Pierce, CV074006557S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court found, in zoning enforcement action, that although owners no longer charged fee for use of their property for all terrain vehicles (ATV), because their internet site referenced "day passes and group or club rates" and owners accepted donations in the rage of $ 30 to $ 4 from each ATV user, the use by ATV constituted "commercial business."
|
|||||
| Elec. Cable Compounds, Inc. v. Town of Seymour, CV054002555,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Escrow contract between town and lessee of business property was intended to benefit only those parties; thus subsequent owners were not third-party beneficiaries of contract and therefore, could not intervene under Conn. Gen. Stat. 52-29(a) and Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-56(b) in the lessee's action to recover the escrow monies.
|
|||||
| Elfire, LLC v. Town of Redding, CV054003195S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Elia v. Elia, AC 27080,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because wife in dissolution case testified that, although her current salary was $ 16 per hour, her hourly rate of pay was to be reduced to between $ 11 and $ 13 shortly after final hearing, evidence supported finding that wife's earning capacity for Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-84(d) purposes was less than her actual income at the time of trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
