|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 12, 2002
|
| |
Howard v. Xerox Credit Corp., CV010385010,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Broker was entitled to present alternative theories of contract liability and adequately pleaded statutory cause of action for unfair trade practices.
|
|
| |
Maud v. John Donovan Enters., CV000373974,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Statement that defendants knew or should have known product was dangerous but they continued to manufacture it, contained within count alleging negligence, did not allege recklessness necessary to support plaintiffs' prayer for punitive damages.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pinsker v. Fleming, CV010382908,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although doctrine of sudden emergency was substantive law, how it was to be pleaded was procedural and law of forum state applied; therefore, under Connecticut law, it had to be pleaded as simple denial.
|
|
| |
Pope v. Sotil, CV010385727,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Police officer, who was performing official duties on public property at time of incident, was never on private property; therefore, "firefighter's rule" did not apply.
|
|
| |
Vartelas Trust v. Bartomeli Co., CV00071234S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parties' intent was controlling factor in determining whether assignment occurred. Licenses were generally not assignable. Court found that licensee did not intend to assign rights under license, and no assignment occurred.
|
|
| |
Villoch v. Reznikoff, CV000597560S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, April 12, 2002, Decided , April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court overruled plaintiff's objection to defendant's request to have plaintiff submit to medical exam, since in a personal injury case it was not sufficient grounds for objection that physician performed other exams for defendant and was biased.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback