|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 5, 2004
|
| |
State v. Peay, H14HCR030570570,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 14 AT HARTFORD, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's allegations of misconduct or bias during jury deliberations were mere speculation where there were no affidavits, evidence, or testimony to proffer in order to support his assertions that the jury did not deliberate long enough.
|
|
| |
Thorpe Trucking, LLC v. Devit, CV030474926S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Tomasso Bros., Inc. v. Blumenthal, CV030829632,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: State attorney general did not have investigative authority to issue subpoenas duces tecum to seven separate entities; statute allowing it to investigate public contracts expressly prohibited investigation of the "large state contracts" involved.
|
|
| |
Whimsels, Inc. v. Ametrano, CV030474834,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 5, 2004, Decided , March 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A motion to open judgment was denied where defense counsel failed to comply with the procedural and substantive requirements and the motion contained an insufficient basis on which the court could afford defendant relief.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback