|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 6, 2007
|
| |
Ferrucci v. Town of Middlebury, CV065002597S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Former policeman's claim of promissory estoppel in complaint seeking pension benefits from a town was stricken because the policeman failed to allege any specific actions taken in detrimental reliance on a written response from an unidentified third party informing the policeman and the town that he was eligible for retirement on December 1, 2004.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gregory v. Gregory, FA054007863,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Despite the fact that a husband's act of cancelling the wife's American Express card violated the spirit of the court's standing orders, it declined to find him in contempt and did not award the wife temporary alimony as an alternative remedy. Further, the husband's motion for counsel fees on grounds that the motion was frivolous was also denied.
|
|
| |
Johnnycake Mt. Assocs. v. Ochs, HHBCV03 0524226,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action that resulted in a judgment of strict foreclosure, a mortgagee improperly placed a judgment lien under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-380a(a) on another parcel of real estate belonging to the owner because the judgment of strict foreclosure did not constitute a money judgment under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-350a(13) but was a judgment in rem.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Miller v. City of New Haven, CV030179416S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pergola v. General Contr. Servs., CV065000746S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|