 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Whitaker v. Taylor, AC 26549,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding that alleged vice president was not liable for damages after lender sued him for, inter alia, breach of contract, fraud, and violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq.; he was defaulted for failure to plead, default entry determined his liability, and, thus, she was entitled to at least nominal damages from him.
|
|||||
| White v. Towantic Woods Assocs., CV044001446S,,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for homeowners against contractors as they breached express warranty under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-117 to construct home in workmanlike manner and implied warranties under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-118(a)(3) to construct home in workmanlike manner since they showed significant degree of incompetency in home's construction.
|
|||||
| Wiltzius v. Garden Homes Mgmt., CV040092934,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 6, 2007, Decided , March 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In view of plaintiff's failure to appeal a prior denial of the declaratory judgment request, and the failure to comply with the notice provision of Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-56(b), Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-56(b) could not be said to provide the basis for the citing in of the proposed additional parties.
|
|||||
| Zanker Group, LLC v. Summerville at Litchfield Hills, LLC, UWY(X10)CV044010223S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit brought by a company against various other companies, because the trial court found that no fraudulent transfer occurred, as that term was used in Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 52-552b(12), 52-552e, nor 52-552f, and found no credibility in plaintiff's asserted lack of knowledge of the transaction, all but one of plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
