 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cafro v. Brophy, (AC 18478),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A disclaimer of warranties in a contract for the purchase of a home was required to specifically set out which of the statutory warranties the seller was disclaiming in order to provide proper notice to the buyer.
|
|||||
| Gagne v. Vaccaro, (SC 16351),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was allowed to use quantum meruit and unjust enrichment to recover fees from another attorney who succeeded him where he defended client's interests successfully and client intended that attorney recover part of the total fee.
|
|||||
| Holley v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 19454),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed denial of a habeas corpus petition. Drug dealer's counsel was not ineffective for introducing dealer's prior possession offense to show dealer was not predisposed to deal as a reasonable strategy for an entrapment defense.
|
|||||
| Rosato v. Rosato, (SC 16250),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed and remanded financial orders of a dissolution judgment. Trial court was to reconsider alimony and other factors to determine the part of husband's pension payable to wife.
|
|||||
| Saunders v. Stigers, (AC 20408),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a default notice did not specifically use the words "foreclosure" or "sale of property," it was apparent from the language of the notice that defendant was notified of the possibilities of foreclosure as required by the mortgage.
|
|||||
| State v. Bowens, (AC 19070),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a photo lineup, it was clear from the record that the police in no way highlighted or emphasized defendant's photograph, or did they in any manner verbally or demonstratively indicate anything to witness that might be considered suggestive.
|
|||||
| State v. Clark, (AC 18365),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prior sighting of weapon in defendant's possession was admissible to show possession of tools for charged crime; failure to respond to Batson explanation or to cross-examine witness precluded review of issues raised later.
|
|||||
| State v. Green, (AC 18369),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was improper for a jury to convict a defendant of conspiracy offenses when the record was devoid of any previous agreement between defendant and his alleged co-conspirators.
|
|||||
| State v. Kennison, (AC 20517),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 6, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed conviction of brutal murder, felony murder, burglary, and larceny of a elderly victim. The court did not abuse its discretion by not ordering statutory psychiatric tests prior to sentencing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
