|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 7, 2007
|
| |
Christophe v. Somerset Capital Group, CV065003587S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In case involving former employee's harassment/discrimination action against employer, bankruptcy trustee's motion to be added as party plaintiff pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. §§ 9-19 and 9-20 was granted because trustee was real party in interest with exclusive standing to assert claims which were property of bankruptcy estate.
|
|
| |
Dorsey v. Beverly, CV065004081,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment was granted in favor of car rental company in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-154a vicarious liability personal injury action; as occupants of car hit by rental vehicle did not allege any negligence or wrongdoing by the company, 49 U.S.C.S. § 30106 barred any action against the company on the basis of vicarious liability.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Green v. Narain, CV065003326,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: While it was true that the dental center could not be held primarily liable because it was not a licensed health care provider, because it could still be held vicariously liable for the acts of its agents under the doctrine of respondeat superior, and a dentist employee was named as a party, the motion to strike the counts was denied.
|
|
| |
Helenese v. Allstate Ins. Co., FSTCV065001076S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to dismiss state insurance department as party was granted because a lessee and a driver who brought the suit conceded that they were not seeking liability from the state insurance department, and admitted there was no real controversy or adversity between them and the state insurance department.
|
|
| |
Host Am. Corp. v. Ramsey, CV064019497S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
In re Eric A., H12CP04009733A, H12CP04009734A, H12CP04009735A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Clear and convincing evidence showed that termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the children of a mother and a father, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(2). The father consented to termination, and the mother failed to rehabilitate herself and continued to become embroiled in domestic violence incidents.
|
|
| |
In re Vincent A., H12CP04009732A, H12CP04009733A, H12CP04009734A, H12CP04009735A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Johnson v. Yale New Haven Hosp., CV055001386S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Lawrence v. Statewide Griev. Comm., CV054016602S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 7, 2007, Decided , March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney's appeal from an order of reprimand was dismissed because the facts as determined by the statewide grievance committee were supported by evidence contained in the record and the conclusions reached were legally correct; the $ 20,000 the attorney received as a fee for negotiating a $35,000 settlement was excessive.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
