Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - March 6, 2003
	Traystman, Coric and Keramidas v. Daigle, 125598, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, March 6, 2003, Decided , March 6, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Where the attorney, in the courthouse on the date that the divorce trial was to begin, threatened withdrawal from the case if the client did not sign the promissory note, the note was signed under duress and was null and void. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Tyler v. Stander, FA010122695, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, March 6, 2003, Decided , March 6, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Where child support worksheet showed presumptive monthly support of $ 2,134, including a child care contribution, and father, at one time, had paid voluntary monthly support of $ 2,000, it was fair to set his child support duty at $ 2,000 per month. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Votto v. Am. Car Rental, Inc., CV010456354S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2003, Decided , March 6, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Truck rental contract was an adhesion contract, and limitation to vehicle damage waiver was unenforceable. Renter was entitled to fees and punitive damages under UTPA where rental company, inter alia, charged truck damages to renter's credit card. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.