 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Huynh v. Huynh, FA030399337S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court dissolved husband's and wife's 1985 marriage, gave the wife primary residential custody of the parties' two minor children, ordered the husband to pay $ 181 per week in child support, but did not award alimony to either party.
|
|||||
| Jensen v. DePaolo, CV010277460S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bar owners' motion for summary judgment as to a claim of negligent service of alcohol was denied because the owners failed to properly support the summary judgment motion, and the claim was not barred by the Connecticut Dram Shop Act.
|
|||||
| Jensen v. DePaolo, CV010277460S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alcohol permit holder's motion for summary judgment as to a claim of negligent service of alcohol was denied because the permit holder failed to support the motion, and the claim was not barred by the Connecticut Dram Shop Act.
|
|||||
| Jensen v. DePaolo, CV010277460S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted to a club owner and permittee in an assault victim's action, alleging negligent supervision of patrons, as the intoxicated patrons left the club and assaulted the victim while in a second club.
|
|||||
| Juniper Ridge Assocs. v. Wallingford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020518845S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: De novo review of Connecticut zoning commission's refusal to approve multi-family affordable housing proposal determined that public safety and welfare did not support the decision; therefore, it was overruled.
|
|||||
| Kapp v. Home Depot, Inc., CV030825419,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A retailer's summary judgment motion was granted as to a home owner's product liability claim; the claim against the retailer was actually a subrogation claim against an insured of an insolvent insurer and was, therefore, barred by state law.
|
|||||
| Leviness v. Klebe Fuel Co., CV020087327S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There were genuine material facts in a dispute as to the cause of a fire and whether a service company was responsible for it. The same was true as to whether homeowners' actions of trying to fight the fire was an intervening cause.
|
|||||
| Licamele v. Licamele, FA020390988,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, MIDDLESEX REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET AT MIDDLETOWN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted divorce and entered orders for custody of three minor children to husband with visitation to wife, medical care of children, division of marital property (home and its encumbrances to husband), insurance, and income taxes.
|
|||||
| Loveras v. Loveras, FA030400164S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
