 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ortiz v. Warden, CV010003463,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT SOMERS, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's habeas corpus petition alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in relation to a guilty plea was denied, as the inmate's plea was voluntary, and the inmate failed to show that a miscarriage of justice occurred.
|
|||||
| Ox Ridge Hunt Club v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Darien, CV020191228,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A non-profit equestrian club's applications for a special use permit and site plan approval were properly denied where the planning and zoning commission determined that such was not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood.
|
|||||
| R.D. Wolf, Inc. v. Brancard, CV010507650S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A builder's possible violations of a state unfair trade practices act were not preempted by federal copyright laws where builder took plans drawn by an architect and built a home without compensating the architect for the copyrighted plans.
|
|||||
| State v. Scruggs, CR020210921S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A juror's acknowledgement in two newspaper articles that a defendant's plan to sue a city civilly figured into his consideration of finding the defendant guilty of risk of injury to a minor did not actually prejudice the defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Scruggs, CR020210921S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for risk of injury to her son's health. The evidence showed that defendant provided a cluttered, squalid, fetid home that endangered the health of her son, who committed suicide.
|
|||||
| Stone v. Viola, CV000274865S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An additur was granted as the jury could not reasonably have found the driver to be responsible initially for the victim's economic damages resulting from medical treatment for his pain and discomfort, but not liable for any noneconomic damages.
|
|||||
| Sumrell v. Town of Hamden, CV010457648S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 8, 2004, Decided , March 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' objections to victims' revised complaint was overruled, as the proposed amendments were not barred by the statute of limitations because they did not allege new factual situations and thus, related back to the original complaint.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
