 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anufrijevas v. American Photography Appliance Corp. Greenfield, CV 980064574S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's lack of control over a defective product within the last 15 years barred plaintiff's products liability action under the statute of repose.
|
|||||
| Arremony v. American States Ins. Co., 114910,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though truck operated by plaintiff at time of accident was not insured by primary insurer alleged by secondary insurer, there remained a genuine issue of material fact as to whether truck was insured by any other company.
|
|||||
| Connors v. Orsine, CV 950248312S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's summary judgment motion on property owners' action alleging negligence, recklessness, and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act granted because the claims were untimely brought.
|
|||||
| Day v. Yale Univ. Sch. of Drama, CV 970400876S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff student alleged a legally sufficient CUTPA claim against defendant school, because he pled more than simple breach of contract, and he alleged that defendant school had a duty to disclose his deficient performance.
|
|||||
| Doyen v. Essex Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 980087357S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of plaintiffs' appeal was reversed. Proposed expansion was in derogation of zoning regulations which mandated no nonconforming characteristic of any improvement was to be enlarged, extended, or expanded.
|
|||||
| Forte v. Citicorp Mortg., CV 930301587S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant lender won summary judgment in plaintiffs' breach of contract and duty suit, as it had no contractual duty to perform an accurate appraisal for plaintiffs and there was no evidence of a refinancing agreement.
|
|||||
| Housing Auth. v. Local 1303-260, Council 4, AFSCME, (AC 18276),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly struck portion of arbitration award concerning a typist position, because defendant union local withdrew the portion of grievance concerning the typist position prior to hearing by arbitration board.
|
|||||
| In re Amber B., (AC 19700),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of respondent father's parental rights with respect to his daughter was proper, as the trial court properly found respondent had not achieved sufficient personal rehabilitation to be effective parent to the child.
|
|||||
| Jane Doe One v. Oliver, File No. CV990151679S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 7, 2000, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Internet service provider was immune to federal suit on claims that would have made it liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service.
|
|||||
| Kolomiets v. Syncor Int'l Corp., (SC 16081),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. Deviation from his job duties was minor and not so unreasonable and unwarranted as to preclude him from receiving workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
