 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brae v. Yarmolovich, CV970397579,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury in personal injury case awarded economic damages only, and there was a reasonable basis in evidence for that verdict, and no mistake of law, verdict was proper, and non-economic damages were not required to be awarded.
|
|||||
| Campagna v. Campagna, FA960539516S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where children and mother had moved to Minnesota, but father still resided in Connecticut, and original child visitation order was entered in Connecticut, Connecticut court retained continuing exclusive jurisdiction over visitation orders.
|
|||||
| Carnein v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV980489419,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insured settled with party later deemed to be at fault for accident, then filed for uninsured motorist benefits claiming another, uninsured driver was responsible for her injuries, insurer had no obligation to pay benefits.
|
|||||
| Diversified Floors, Inc. v. Riverpoint Condo. Ass'n, CV000599869S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant raised plaintiff's failure to comply with Home Improvement Act in motion to strike complaint alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment, motion was denied. Act was properly raised in special defense.
|
|||||
| Enfield Sq., LLC v. S. Hecht & Sons, Inc., CV000804236S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where landowner approved work but did not agree to pay for it, and under lease, tenant was responsible for work done on leased premises, contractor did not have valid mechanic's lien against landowner.
|
|||||
| Genovesi v. Genovesi, FA900303633,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was not entitled to child support modification based on trial court's failure to follow child support guidelines where the parties' income exceeded the child support guidelines maximum, making the guidelines inapplicable.
|
|||||
| Gigante v. Gigante, FA990334901S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon wife's petition for divorce and other orders, the court dissolved the marriage, ordered joint custody, ordered the husband to pay alimony and child support, divided the parties' property, and made other miscellaneous orders.
|
|||||
| In re Jashon R., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS AT HARTFORD, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitions for termination of parental rights were granted; there was no evidence to suggest that mother or father undertook any rehabilitative steps toward reunification, or that they were likely to do so within a reasonable time.
|
|||||
| In re Robert P., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS AT WATERBURY, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The reasons for guardianship of a mother's children still existed and it was not in the children's best interest to be returned to her.
|
|||||
| Integrated Disability Res., Inc. v. Bracken, CV000597755S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence showing employer owed a former employee bonuses based on the former employee's past performance was sufficient for the former employee to survive the employer's motion to strike counterclaim for wages and benefits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
