LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - March 7, 2000

  
Package Masters v. Berry, CV 9901725587S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Quality Coils v. Administrator, CV 990495519S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an employment case, appellee board properly gave former employee benefit of the doubt, and findings were not so lacking in factual foundation as to make the conclusions drawn from the evidence arbitrary and unreasonable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Roper v. D.P.T. Enterprises, CV 990174828S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Santos v. Petrone, CV 990065706S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a claim for personal injuries, plaintiff's amended complaint did not state a new cause of action that would be time barred upon the filing of the amended complaint; summary judgment was therefore denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Scranton v. Warden State Prison, CV 970327117S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner's counsel's motion to withdraw as appellate counsel was granted. Petitioner's testimony at his habeas trial was not credible, petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof, and petitioner's appeal was frivolous.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Gundel, (AC 18475), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to withdraw nolo contendere pleas to unlawful restraint and assault was properly denied, because the sentence imposed by trial court did not exceed the sentence previously agreed to by defendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hafford, (SC 16089), SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Sufficient probable cause was established to try defendant for charged offenses, and adequate evidence supported conclusion that defendant committed offenses. Confession was product of voluntary waiver of Miranda rights.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Robinson, (AC 19242), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 7, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Use of prior inconsistent statement from witness did not prevent him from being subjected to cross-examination. Flight from scene jury instruction was not unbalanced or improper and did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Vangor v. Vangor, FA 980148329S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 7, 2000, Decided , March 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In divorce proceeding, court determined marriage was irretrievably broken and ordered dissolution. Defendant husband was order to pay child support and alimony, and order to quitclaim home to plaintiff wife.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.