 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lesniewski v. Walsh, FA980076988S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A change in circumstances justifying modification of alimony in wife's favor occurred when bankruptcy court discharged debt that husband had been ordered to pay as part of divorce judgment and wife was forced to assume the debt.
|
|||||
| Mitchell v. Mitchell, 0550826S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where wife's parents contributed to purchase and maintenance of marital home, wife retained the majority of the equity after divorce; joint custody was ordered despite wife's desire for sole custody.
|
|||||
| Mohegan Tribal Gaming Auth. v. PNE Media, LLC, CV000119697S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted motions to strike third-party complaints because the billboard owner did not allege why the agents of the billboard owner and the lessee should have been liable to it if the lessee's suit was successful.
|
|||||
| Pendarvis v. Harrison, CV980408681S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court ruled for defendant on counterclaim for breach of contract against plaintiff; plaintiff breached the contract, as plaintiff agreed to modify it for repairs to plaintiff's roof, and defendant fully performed as agreed.
|
|||||
| Reyes v. Allstate Ins. Co., CV960331639,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 7, 2001, Decided , March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action by insured seeking damages under uninsured motorist provision of her automobile insurance policy, trial court reduced jury's award of economic damages because plaintiff did not prove past and future damages in amount awarded.
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, CR293692,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In case charging unlawful removal or alteration of records, defendant could not attack information based on insufficient evidence, and the criminal statute was not void for vagueness or desuetude and did not implicate the First Amendment.
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, CR293692,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not show fact allegedly omitted from arrest warrant affidavit was material to probable cause determination, or that omission was intended to make affidavit misleading, Franks hearing was not warranted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
