 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. Smith, DBDFA010341470S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 8, 2007, Decided , March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former husband was found to be in contempt of court for his failure to abide by a court's orders regarding the rollover of funds from a 401(k) account to an IRA; the orders were valid and their language was unambiguous regarding the husband's responsibilities and his testimony to the contrary was not credible.
|
|||||
| Somers W. Towne Houses, Inc. v. Las Props., Ltd. P'ship, CV054001489S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 8, 2007, Decided , March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Community owners association was entitled to summary judgment on a partnership's counterclaim, which was premised on the alleged illegality of a budget ratification vote; because only six owners voted to reject the proposed budget, the budget was deemed ratified under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-245(c).
|
|||||
| Spera v. Waterford Bd. of Educ., CV044000969,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 8, 2007, Decided , March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' summary judgment motion was granted as to a student's personal injury action, as defendants were immune pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-557n, as defendants' allegedly negligent act of failing to secure a blocking sled on a football practice field was discretionary as a matter of law, and the imminent harm exception did not apply.
|
|||||
| Supreme Indus. v. Town of Bloomfield, X03CV034022269,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT HARTFORD, March 8, 2007, Decided , March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case arising out of an agreement between the parties for a corporation to build a golf course for a town, as the corporation's claim as articulated in its post-trial brief was essentially a claim seeking payment for a debt owed, the corporation was not entitled to recover on its claim of statutory theft, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-564.
|
|||||
| Vargas v. Labella, CV065001941S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2007, Decided , March 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff, who had been convicted of molesting defendants' child, sued them for malicious prosecution, the complaint's failure to allege facts sufficient to show that plaintiff's conviction was obtained by fraud, perjury, or other corrupt means was fatal to that claim, and it was stricken on defendants' motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
