LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - March 5, 2002

  
Somers Mill Assocs. v. Fuss & O'Neill, X03CV000503944, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: As their expert was barred from providing new testimony, the clients failed to provide any competent expert evidence in a professional malpractice case that the engineering company violated the applicable standard of care.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Spearman v. State, CV990431108S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied petitioner's motion to reopen case against state which court dismissed after neither petitioner nor his attorney appeared for trial. Petitioner's reasoning indicated he did not have a good cause of action or apply for continuance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Carrasco, (SC 16333), SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 5, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: For purposes of fair cross section analysis, defendant needed to show that Hispanic males were distinctive group. Record did not show that underrepresentation of Hispanic males would have resulted in bias and partiality on part of juries.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Irala, (AC 19874), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 5, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Appeals court affirmed illegal alien's larceny convictions. She received sentence agreed to in voluntary pleas after allocution that substantially informed her of direct plea consequences and warned her of indirect possible immigration consequences.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Yancey v. Conn. Life & Cas. Ins. Co., (AC 21088), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 5, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: In wrongful termination action, grant of summary judgment in favor of employer was upheld because employee failed to present factual predicate to raise genuine issue that dismissal occurred for reason that violated public policy.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.