|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 9, 2004
|
| |
Ranciato v. Ford Motor Co., CV030480478,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 9, 2004, Decided , March 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Customer's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim was stricken as to a manufacturer, as the comments to the trial court made by the manufacturer's former and present attorneys were privileged and could not form the basis of such a claim.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Scalia Bros. Trucking Co. v. Bristol Sand & Gravel, CV020518318S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 9, 2004, Decided , March 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An agreement for the removal of earth material between a property owner and a sand and gravel business was a license, not a lease; under the agreement the owner could, and did, revoke the license for lack of action by the business.
|
|
| |
Senk v. City of New Haven, CV040485422S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, March 9, 2004, Decided , March 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Former employee's suit against city was stayed pending final outcome of grievance, which was in arbitration, as city had taken inconsistent positions as to whether the grievance had been automatically exhausted when the former employee was laid off.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Wallerstein v. Stew Leonard's Dairy, CV960151020S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 9, 2004, Decided , March 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As there was no proof that store's employees admitted that screw found in a roll that injured plaintiff's teeth came from store's bakery machinery, consumer failed to prove store's defense was frivolous and was denied attorney's fees.
|
|
| |
Wanklin v. Gates, 565549,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 9, 2004, Decided , March 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because the inmate failed to prove that excessive force was used against him or that he had suffered the loss of any rights guaranteed to him under the federal or state constitution.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback