 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Branford v. Commercial Flooring Concepts, Inc., CV030826299S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where movant, apportionment defendant, filed motion to dismiss asserting that injured party's direct negligence action against movant was untimely, this argument could not be asserted in motion to dismiss and had to be asserted as special defense.
|
|||||
| Chatterjee v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., CV000500672S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court lacked authority to review a discretionary decision of the Commissioner of Revenue Services, denying taxpayers' claim for a refund for two particular years, as a controlling statute specifically excluded the court's ability to review.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Lasaga, CV990430858S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School board's motion for a directed verdict was granted as to plaintiffs' claim that the board was negligent in failing to supervise a counselor in a volunteer mentor program, because the board was entitled to governmental immunity.
|
|||||
| Dunican v. Bernhard-Thomas Bldg. Sys., CV030568019S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employee failed to meet his burden under the probable cause standard for a prejudgment remedy and accordingly, such relief was denied; the court considered the credibility of the witnesses and weighed the probabilities.
|
|||||
| Engen v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV020192283,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because homeowners' variance application to construct a three-car garage was properly found to be substantially different from a previous application and the town zoning board properly granted the variance, an appeal of that grant was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Farmington Sav. Bank v. Am. Modular Corp., CV030826983S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A commercial waiver in a promissory note, which waived notice and a hearing for a prejudgment remedy, could not be utilized repeatedly by a bank after a lawsuit had commenced. Nor could the bank file numerous writs with new return dates.
|
|||||
| In re Lindsey P. 1, T11CP030011536,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Comparing to Fourth Amendment Warrant Clause, court found children services (DCF) worker's affidavit for child protective custody was false and misleading, vacated custody order, did not order contempt, but ordered DCF to prevent recurrence.
|
|||||
| Kearns-Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, FA020392884S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dissolution of marriage case, the court awarded custody of two minor children to wife, ordered husband to pay child support, ordered the husband to quit claim his interest in the family home to wife, and awarded no alimony to either party.
|
|||||
| Kustan v. Kustan, FA030404089S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 10, 2004, Decided , March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties' marriage had broken down irretrievably, it was dissolved; the marital residence was to be sold and the proceeds divided 70/30, the husband's retirement accounts were to be split equally, and the wife was entitled to alimony.
|
|||||
| SHP Mgmt. v. Blakeney, HDSP127155, H1252,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, March 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a landlord failed to recite within the complaint for summary process or annex thereto a pre-termination notice, the complaint was not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of the practice book and had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
