|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 8, 2000
|
| |
Pancorbo v. Highland, CV 970140810S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Tenant's personal injury claim was not barred by res judicata since it arose from separate legal obligation, involved additional issues and parties, and was not one that might have been made in earlier rent collection case.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Hunt, MV 99639059,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Witness reports to police officer of drunk driver in light-colored car following them on highway, which car appeared moments later, gave officer objective basis for suspecting crime; seizure of evidence was constitutional.
|
|
| |
Stellato v. Cuccaro, CV 98063811,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Sheriff was requested to change date, he neglected to. To hold the failure of the sheriff to abide by the instructions of the attorney and bar the plaintiff from his day in court would elevate procedure over substance.
|
|
| |
Thomas v. Thomas, FA 990425592S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Woodie-Austin v. Austin, FA 990498936S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Zagar v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, CV 980144320S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 8, 2000, Decided , March 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Age discrimination complaint was properly dismissed where plaintiff did not demonstrate there was reasonable cause for believing that the discriminatory practice had been committed but merely presented a prima facie case.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|