 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rand Constr. v. Walker, CV010095884S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In contractor's defamation suit, court granted summary judgment to persons who complained to state wetlands agency about local wetlands agency and contractor's compliance, since quasi-judicial complaint was immune as part of formal procedure.
|
|||||
| Russell v. Stratford Zoning Comm'n, CV000369613S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The zoning commission had more than adequate information which allowed it to arrive at a well considered decision. The commission also had jurisdiction to approve the petition for approval as a special case.
|
|||||
| Sherman v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., CV990078688S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance applicant's knowing misrepresentation, when applying for additional life insurance, that his cancer was in remission, voided insurer's obligation under insurance policy and allowed it to seek rescission of insurance policy.
|
|||||
| Soccoccia v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV010806001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commission did not act arbitrarily or illegally since there was substantial evidence that construction in flood plain had limited or insignificant effect and that project was essentially rehabilitation of existing structures.
|
|||||
| Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: During the representation, there was considerable interaction between the client and the law firm. The court held the client had significant purposeful contacts with Connecticut and there was specific jurisdiction over the client.
|
|||||
| Weil v. Macri, CV020459617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss replevin action under prior pending action doctrine since replevin could not be asserted as a counterclaim in other action, which was for dissolution of parties' alleged partnership.
|
|||||
| Weil v. Macri, CV020459617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner proved that he was sole owner of puppets, that puppets were not assets of partnership, and that partner wrongfully retained them. Affidavit sufficiently complied with statute, but bond was insufficient.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
