|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 9, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Pattyson, MV060609297S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 2 AT BRIDGEPORT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion under the CADAC statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. ?? 17a-695 and 17a-696, for suspension of prosecution of a charge against him of DUI, in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ??14-227a, was denied, as such was a proscribed offense which made him ineligible for the special treatment pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ??17a-696(a).
|
|
| |
Tracy v. Sarosh, FA064026430S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: After considering all the evidence that was presented to it, as well as the respective statutory criteria for a custody/visitation application, and observing the demeanor of the witnesses, the court determined that the mother and father were to enjoy joint legal custody of the minor child.
|
|
| |
Turgeon v. Town of E. Lyme, 054002613,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: When an application to conduct regulated activities on a wetland lot was denied, there had been an unlawful taking without compensation under the Fifth Amendment and Conn. Const. art. I. There had been a practical confiscation because the land could be used only in its natural state, and the public benefit did not outweigh the harm to plaintiff.
|
|
| |
Wilson v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., CV055000125S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 9, 2007, Decided , March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Business was entitled to directed verdict in business invitee's personal injury action; invitee failed to establish business had constructive knowledge of defect in chair that collapsed as invitee sat in it as there was no evidence as to chairs construction or that screw or nut invitee observed on floor after collapse was a vital part of the chair.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback