Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - March 11, 2004

  
Bazinet v. Barry, CV030082306, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A town board of education was immune from liability for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress allegedly done by school officials, as there was no statutory waiver that imposed liability on either count.

Search Cases for Free

  
Forest Walk, LLC v. Town of Middlebury Conservation Comm'n, CV020169965S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where substantial evidence supported at least one of a wetlands agency's reasons for denying a permit application, a challenge to that decision was subject to dismissal; the agency was not required to state alternative actions on the record.

Search Cases for Free

  
Irizarry v. Irizarry, FA960151192S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court reduced father's weekly child support (CS) from $ 104 to $ 80 for one child; father was entitled to CS guideline deduction for court-ordered CS paid for one previous child, but not for two subsequent children born to current marriage.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kumekawa v. Choate Rosemary Hall Found., Inc., CV030102754S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Lloyd v. Waltham Servs., 562849, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Location Realty v. General Fin. Servs., CV020515663S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A client's summary judgment motion was granted as to a real estate company's action seeking to recover a commission; the company was improperly granted a real estate broker's license, as its corporate officers did not hold broker's licenses.

Search Cases for Free

  
Ramos v. Phillips, CV040286463S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Since the injured parties, who sought double or treble damages, alleged that an alleged tortfeasor deliberately or with reckless disregard violated certain traffic laws, they alleged with sufficient specificity a cause of action in recklessness.

Search Cases for Free

  
Ramsdell v. McDougal, CV030348823S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a school board and an individual filed an affidavit to support their joint motion for summary judgment that was not applicable to both of them, the joint motion was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Soup Alley v. Wilton Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV030193199S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although zoning commission did not expressly approve realtor's proposal for joint parking in its request for a special permit, it nonetheless had discretion to approve a site plan with significantly less parking spaces than proposed by the realtor.

Search Cases for Free

  
Stember v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Norwalk, CV010185506S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2004, Decided , March 11, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a hotel cited competitive advantage, disappointment in use of property, and financial loss or advantage, the reasons did not constitute an exceptional difficulty or hardship, and thus, there was no justification for a zoning variance.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top