 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Biller Assocs. v. Peterken, (AC 17768), (AC 17850),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant property owners were liable under an employment contract where the plaintiff performed and the defendant property owners used the plaintiff's work to negotiate a settlement with an insurance company.
|
|||||
| Boris v. Garbo Lobster Co., (AC 18500),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appeal from commission's decision granting application to amend zoning regulations affirmed where trial court determined no ex parte communication occurred and letter to city planner did not go to substance of proposed amendment.
|
|||||
| Fenton v. Connecticut Hosp. Ass'n Workers' Compensation Trust, (AC 18751),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff not entitled to execute on voluntary workers' compensation agreement, because agreement was not final and enforceable, as agreement stated it was not final, and plaintiff failed to prove causation as to neck injury.
|
|||||
| Hartford Ins. Co. v. Colonia Ins. Co., (AC 18752),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action to recover proceeds allegedly due under insurance policy, judgment favoring defendant affirmed where determination that plaintiff failed to prove lack of prejudice for failure to notify of claim could legally have been drawn from facts.
|
|||||
| Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County, Inc. v. Cantore, (AC 18515),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court incorrectly viewed a complaint for breach of a probate bond as an action for negligence, the facts alleged were insufficient to support a cause of action for breach of a conservator's fiduciary duty.
|
|||||
| Klimaszewski v. Lewis, CV 990266089S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, May 30, 2000, Decided , May 30, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lack of monetary compensation for use of vehicle did not establish arrangement of owner and driver was without adequate consideration to support a rental agreement or lease. Whether lease existed was genuine, material issue of fact.
|
|||||
| Kordick v. Budris, FA 90034212,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, May 30, 2000, Decided , May 30, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was not entitled to dismissal of a motion for contempt regarding child visitation where the court had retained jurisdiction and the motion was not subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act.
|
|||||
| Lena v. Lena, FA 990067799S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, May 30, 2000, Decided , May 30, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce proceeding where marriage was found to be irretrievably broken down and parties could not get along, wife was awarded sole legal and physical custody of the children, but husband was given liberal visitation.
|
|||||
| Marrone v. Carvel Corp., UWY CV 990153408,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 30, 2000, Decided , May 30, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants waived the right to file dilatory pleadings and were required to file an answer to the complaint because they failed to file a pleading within 30 days of the return day of the complaint.
|
|||||
| Pender v. Matranga, (AC 19049),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 30, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Undeveloped lot owners were entitled to construct road over appellants' lots to provide access to their lot where agreement between properties' common grantor and residents provided for future road development to improve lot.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
