 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blint v. Blint, FA000723514,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court dissolved 42-year marriage upon finding that it had irretrievably broken down due to husband's fault. Trial court considered, inter alia, marriage's length and wife's poor health in dividing marital estate and awarding alimony.
|
|||||
| Frank v. Town of Greenwich, CV010385817,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut municipal employee seeking to recover unpaid overtime wages could not sue municipal employer until she had exhausted remedies available under applicable collective bargaining agreement.
|
|||||
| In re Autumn D., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUVENILE MATTERS, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence showed child's parents shook her, causing permanent injury, and parents refused to accept any responsibility or participate in treatment, child was found neglected and parents' parental rights were terminated.
|
|||||
| Miele v. Caine, CV000161732,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client failed to submit sufficient documentation to support prima facie case of legal malpractice against attorney.
|
|||||
| Murdock v. Croughwell, CV980581593,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim of negligent supervision filed against chief of police and city by officer, who was injured in fight with his supervisor, was barred by doctrine of governmental immunity, and court set aside jury verdict against chief of police and city.
|
|||||
| Nucifora v. Orbit Marine Sports Ctr., CV000377691,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issue of fact existed as to the specific defect that caused the injured party's injury; summary judgment motion filed by store owner was denied.
|
|||||
| Ross v. State, CV02389004S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action was dismissed based on doctrine of sovereign immunity and lack of standing where bidders failed to allege state official had violated their rights by acting in excess of statutory authority and failed to allege fraud or favoritism.
|
|||||
| Solieri v. Polletta, CV950128524,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 8, 2002, Decided , March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Home buyer showed no misrepresentations by sellers, real estate agency, or agent, except innocent misrepresentation by sellers as to property's boundary, which was waived in contract. Home inspector breached no contractual duty to buyer.
|
|||||
| Taraian v. Taraian, FA840220800,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's motion for modification was served in accordance with statutory provisions. Court erred in making its order retroactive to date of service; it should have made order effective upon notice to wife.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
