 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lynch v. 7, LLC, CV085003957,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX AT MIDDLETOWN, July 31, 2008, Decided, July 31, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application to discharge lis pendens under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-325a was granted as sellers' counteroffer deleted dining room set. Parties did not agree as to what was for sale, which was essential term for purposes of Connecticut Statute of Frauds. Further, parties did not agree as to whether Connecticut New Home Warranty Act applied.
|
|||||
| Montalvo v. Gardner, CV065003247,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, July 31, 2008, Decided, July 31, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a passenger's complaint put a driver on notice that her alleged negligent operation of her motor vehicle caused his injuries, a change to the prayer for relief under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 10-60(a)(3) was not barred by the statute of limitations in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584, as it related back to the original complaint.
|
|||||
| Omid Nodoushani v. S. Conn. State Univ., CV065007490,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, July 31, 2008, Decided, July 31, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: False arrest and malicious prosecution, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against university were dismissed as they sought money damages, and did not fall within any recognized exception to sovereign immunity doctrine. Connecticut Claims Commissioner had not approved action under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-142.
|
|||||
| Prioleau v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, CV064012907S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, July 31, 2008, Decided, July 31, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commission had sufficient evidence to find employee's layoff was not due to racial discrimination or in retaliation for opposing discriminatory conduct allegedly violating state and federal law; reasonable cause pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-83(c) existed to believe it was due to personality conflict occurring before employee filed lawsuit.
|
|||||
| Summerlin v. Summerlin, FA064006373,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY AT DANBURY, July 31, 2008, Decided, July 31, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, after a consideration of all the criteria of Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46b-56, 46b-56c, 46b-62, 46b-81, 46b-82 and 46b-84 in light of the evidence presented, the marriage was ordered dissolved, and relevant orders were issued. An equal division of income or assets was not attempted or intended.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
