 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Charles E. Williams v. New Milford Planning Comm'n, CV 980492228S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City's denial of developer's affordable housing site plan overturned under heightened scrutiny; city's finding that it had sufficient affordable housing violated statutory mandate and possibly pretextual; record did not support reasons for denial.
|
|||||
| Derisi v. Derisi, FA 990429028S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, May 26, 2000, Decided , May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut marriage was dissolved on grounds of irretrievable breakdown; consideration of statutory factors was required in ordering custody and visitation, marital asset and liability division, and support and alimony.
|
|||||
| Dickinson v. Goodman, CV 990090101,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, May 26, 2000, Decided , May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's claims for damages under a patient's bill of rights against defendants individually were barred because plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege facts to establish that defendants' actions were wanton or reckless.
|
|||||
| Eastman Kodak Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue Servs., CV 980492598S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, May 26, 2000, Decided , May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: With no statutory basis or regulation for policy disallowing deduction of eight-twenty-thirds of commissions paid to foreign services corporation, parent corporation was entitled to refund for taxes paid in years when deduction applied.
|
|||||
| Easton Mem. Gardens v. Piccolo Ex'x, CV 990361504,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgage was declared invalid. Time for completion of its conditions had expired, plaintiff had been in undisturbed possession for required six years afterward, and no payment of debt on mortgage had occurred within that period.
|
|||||
| Estate of Kevin Eastwood v. State, CV 990593932S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital and doctor were not entitled to a motion to strike a plaintiff's or the State's cause of action for negligence where the suit was filed after the effective date of the of the statute that permitted such causes of action.
|
|||||
| Green v. Lumley, CV 980350041S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court lacked jurisdiction to reopen plaintiff's cause of action because plaintiff failed to file her request for reopening within four month after the judgment dismissing her case was announced.
|
|||||
| Kelly v. Ron's Golf Cart Rental, 385960,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, May 26, 2000, Decided , May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Passenger's statutory counts for injury from falling out of golf cart on street were dismissed against his employer and cart owner, but negligence counts remained against driver and owner, as fact issues remained.
|
|||||
| Lorquet v. People's Bank, CV 930309524,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury verdict for plaintiff in slip-and-fall case was affirmed as supported by evidence and not excessive, but court ordered remittitur to correct arithmetic miscalculation by jury of economic damages.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
