 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Argo Fed. Sav. Bank v. Saturno, CV010183536S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Suit against dead person was null and void and judgment in such case could be attacked. Where party failed to provide affidavits, death certificate or other evidence that debtor was dead, court was unable to conclude that debtor was dead.
|
|||||
| Belic v. Amtrak, CV010275697S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual's revised complaint against 2nd railroad was stricken; there was no private right of action in Connecticut to enforce statute regarding procedure for changing crossing signals or to enforce Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
|
|||||
| Cadle Co. v. Gabel, CV000091155,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In order for constructive trust to be imposed, plaintiff needed to show harm. However, alleged harm was not confined to property equity where debtor had been able to divest himself of assets, yet still retained all the benefits of ownership.
|
|||||
| Comm'r of Transp. v. Shea, File No. CV00-0598584S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the commission of transportation failed to adequately the amount of damages resulting from a taking in an eminent domain proceeding, the trial court adjusted the amount of compensation owed to property owners along side a highway.
|
|||||
| Debaise Constr. Co. v. Curello, CV990425839S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because building was functional and owner did not show cause of defects, available remedies, or remediation costs, builder had substantially performed contract and was entitled to foreclose its lien.
|
|||||
| Engelmann v. Dominion Nuclear Conn., X04CV010124475S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to exhaust administrative remedies was jurisdictional defect. Claims asking to prohibit operations and conversion at nuclear power plant were dismissed, as plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
|
|||||
| Findell v. Koos, CV010510859S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trust did not allege contractual relationship, personal receipt of trust property, uncompensated services, or demonstrate requisite control to pierce corporate veil; it did sufficiently allege conspiracy.
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. Stoleson, X05CV000177740S, X05CV980165956S, X05CV990173423S,,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No rational jury could disbelieve the unchallenged and overwhelming evidence that there was no agency relationship between the owners and the driver at the time of the accident. Thus, the statutory presumption did not survive.
|
|||||
| Gourdet v. Gourdet, FA990172034,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage case, where the wife testified that the husband was a loving father and that the children loved him in return, it was in the children's best interests that they maintain a relationship with him.
|
|||||
| Grasso v. Grasso, FA960387585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A father was ordered to pay child support of $ 149 per week, based on the court's finding that the father's earning capacity pursuant to he financial affidavit was $ 600 per week, rather than $ 300 per week as previously claimed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
