Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - April 23, 2002

  
Killion v. Davis, AC 19034, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 23, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute of frauds did not bar claim against corporation president, where he agreed to pay employees bonus if they stayed with corporation for three years. Letters between parties describing terms of agreement was sufficient proof of contract.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kronberg v. N.H. Ins. Co., (AC 20510), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 23, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because passenger did not sue driver or provide evidence that driver was not afforded liability coverage by any policy of motor vehicle insurance, he failed to prove that he exhausted tortfeasor liability insurance.

Search Cases for Free

  
Mytych v. May Dep't Stores Co., (SC 16541), SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 23, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: The commission agreements between the employees and the employer stores did not violate the state wage statutes and summary judgment was proper.

Search Cases for Free

  
Petronio v. Burich, CV010509130S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, April 23, 2002, Decided , April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to strike intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence counts was denied because counts did not sound in medical malpractice, thereby requiring filing of statutory good faith certificate.

Search Cases for Free

  
Rucker v. Brown, FA910285787, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 23, 2002, Decided , April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court granted putative father's motion to open default judgment of paternity where father filed motion some 10 years after judgment was entered but claimed he did not receive notice of action and that judgment was product of fraud or mistake.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Conn. State Emples. Ass'n, CV990592441, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: State statute which set rate of payment for overtime work but provided that rate did not apply to state employees working in professional capacity did not preclude professional employees from bargaining for overtime pay at statutory rate.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Corona, (AC 21197), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 23, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Once defendant waived right to trial by jury, he could be prosecuted by three-judge court for murder and by single judge for conspiracy, and trial court did not err by holding separate trials even though charges arose from same course of conduct.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Francis, AC 21381, APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 23, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Appeals court reversed order denying defendant's motion to correct sentence and remanded case to superior court to dismiss motion; lower court did not have jurisdiction to consider motion since sentence was not illegal, was valid, and had begun.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Green, CR97240189, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentence for sexual assault, kidnapping, and threatening was affirmed because the race of the victim played no part in the sentencing.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Potts, CR94404197, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The sentence imposed was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate since defendant had a history of violence and had refused to participate in violence counseling.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top