|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - August 4, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
Mitchell v. Charland, CV085018789,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, August 4, 2008, Decided, August 4, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A vehicle motorist's claim that a vehicle driver's recklessness pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-295 resulted in a vehicle collision which caused her injuries, for which she sought double or treble damages, withstood challenge by a motion to strike, as the allegations were sufficient to support the claim.
|
|
| |
Torrealba v. Viviel, FA010456598S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, August 4, 2008, Decided, August 4, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Pursuant to a child's best interest under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-56(c), her mother's request to change her elementary school was found unwarranted, as the child's art and music interests were encouraged in her present school, there was no inordinate bullying of the child, and her preference was based on her mother's desires.
|
|
| |
Younger v. City of E. Haven, CV085020500S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, August 4, 2008, Decided, August 4, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a "John Doe" police officer was not properly served and because Connecticut did not permit actions to be initiated against fictitious defendants, the count was dismissed. Having dismissed the count against the individual, plaintiff could not pursue an indemnification claim on the "John Doe's" behalf pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-465.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|