|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 12, 2002
|
| |
Allen v. Johnson, CV0083610S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 12, 2002, Decided , March 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In action to quiet title to two parcels of land, plaintiff met burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that she acquired title to one of the parcels by ousting defendants from possession of that parcel for over 15 years.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brick v. Woodbury Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV010085539,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 12, 2002, Decided , March 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Substantial evidence supported zoning board of appeals' finding that nonconforming use had not been abandoned and decision allowing less intensive nonconforming use to be substituted for it.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Bushey v. Bushey, FA960152020S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 12, 2002, Decided , March 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court granted father's motion to terminate his child support obligation due to substantial change in circumstances: his reduced income, payment of one child's school expenses, and expenses for custody of other child.
|
|
| |
Carrano v. Mjm Studios, CV990423267,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 12, 2002, Decided , March 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because apportionment complaint was not properly served on company, it had to be dismissed. Because company contested personal jurisdiction, it did not timely move to dismiss direct claim.
|
|
| |
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Jemison, CV000800079,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 12, 2002, Decided , March 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Landlords engaged in discriminatory conduct in their housing practices against tenant based on race, color, and marital status. Tenant's poor housekeeping, lifestyle, and damage to premises did not excuse landlords' conduct.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|