Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - April 24, 2002

  
Bain v. Inland Wetlands Comm'n of Oxford, CV990068658S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 5 AT DERBY, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There was support for the commission's decision to deny the application since it spent much time and devoted much consideration to the conditions surrounding the application and the impact upon the delineated wetlands and land proximate to it.

Search Cases for Free

  
Bartol v. Bartol, FA000372154S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Given father's unchanged income and his lack of credibility, his motion to downwardly modify his support obligations was denied. Father was found in contempt for ignoring his court-ordered insurance obligations without any reasonable excuse.

Search Cases for Free

  
Behling v. Bennett, CV980089600S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court enforced signed contract to settle minority shareholder's suit against corporation and other shareholders; minority shareholder did not prove mutual or unilateral mistake about his stock redemption payments by clear and convincing evidence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Burton v. Statewide Griev. Comm., File No. CV000505715S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The attorney, who was charged with misconduct, could point to no objective, material fact that supported her public assertion that the judges deliberately made misstatements. Her charge amounted to puerile quibbling over phraseology.

Search Cases for Free

  
Friedman v. Conn. Bar Examining Comm., 435655, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Record supported bar examining committee's finding that law school graduate cheated on an exam. He was denied entry to the bar.

Search Cases for Free

  
Giametti v. Inspections, Inc., CV000438176S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where 3rd individual represented that a house that was being sold had no infestation problems, she was liable to 2nd individual for negligent misrepresentation, as she should have known of an ant infestation. However, fraud was not proven.

Search Cases for Free

  
Giantis v. Am. Mortg. Servs., LP, CV000092711S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In employee's hostile work environment suit against employer, court dismissed constructive wrongful discharge (for failure to pursue administrative remedy), contract claims, and invasion of privacy, but not NIED.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hester v. Wezner, 561929, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
L. Suzio Concrete Co. v. Birmingham Constr. Servs. Co., CV000432130S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 24, 2002, Decided , April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Michaael Jon Barbarula v. Haniewski, CV970437585S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because decedent's estate filed offer of judgment within 18 months of date on which it filed complaint and obtained verdict exceeding settlement offer after trial, estate was entitled to interest on judgment from date it filed complaint.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top