|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - August 6, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sagamore Ins. v. Deming, CV075011800S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A vehicle operator's motion for summary judgment in an insurer's declaratory judgment action, arising from a dispute as to its duty to defend in an underlying matter that arose from a vehicle collision, was denied, as the operator failed to provide a copy of the policy for comparison with the allegations of the underlying complaint.
|
|
| |
Silverstein v. Camposeo, TTDCV054002560S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND AT ROCKVILLE, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Inasmuch as the court did not have the benefit of a plaintiff's reply brief when it denied his petition for a writ of mandamus, it would permit the requested reargument on the points raised in the plaintiff's Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ? 11-12(c) motion for reargument.
|
|
| |
Smith v. Warden, State Prison, CV044000126S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to dismiss was granted as habeas petition was successive under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 23-99 as first set of petitions attacked trial counsel's failure to allow inmate to explain inconsistency in response to officer and to object to jury instruction, and present petition attacked trial counsel's elicitation of testimony during direct examination.
|
|
| |
TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Carneiro, CV075010465S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD AT BRIDGEPORT, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the consequences for any mistake in the amount of a lender's bid at a foreclosure sale should fall solely on the it, and because the actions of the Committee in conducting the sale were not so irregular as to call into question the entire proceeding, the lender's objection to the court's approval of a sale was overruled.
|
|
| |
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Fraum, LLICV075002610S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD AT LITCHFIELD, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A mortgagee was entitled to summary judgment on liability in a foreclosure action where it showed that it was the owner of a promissory note which was lost, that the note and mortgage were in default, that the mortgagee had elected to accelerate the indebtedness, and that the mortgagors failed to make payments or cure the default.
|
|
| |
Young v. MG Cleaning Servs., LLC, CV075014650,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, August 6, 2008, Decided, August 6, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the court could not discern from an injured employee's complaint whether he was proceeding on a theory of negligence or a theory of premises liability against a cleaning company, the company's motion to strike the counts against it in the complaint was granted.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback