 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Breen v. Breen, FA074106862S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON AT NORWICH, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A dissolution of marriage was entered between a husband and wife due to the irretrievable breakdown of their marriage with no hope of reconciliation; orders were also entered regarding their custody and parenting rights over their child and as to the division of the parties' assets.
|
|||||
| Caltabiano v. L&L Real Estate Holdings II, LLC, CV0419729S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD AT BRIDGEPORT, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motions to strike property owners' fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110b(a), claims were granted because the owners failed to sufficiently allege that an engineer, a company, and a developer were liable based upon the failure of the engineer to disclose his involvement in the developer to land use bodies.
|
|||||
| Dickinson v. Tomatore, CV075012580,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD AT BRIDGEPORT, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenant's suit against a landlord arising from a fall on the lawn of rented property failed to state a claim under Connecticut UTPA because the tenant failed to allege a nexus, as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110g(a), between the residence's alleged zoning violations and her fall outside of the house.
|
|||||
| Gates v. Gates, CV084009454,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA-MILFORD AT DERBY, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to dismiss filed by a decedent's husband was granted in an appeal by a decedent's son of a probate court's order because the son failed to commence the appeal with the superior court within thirty days of the mailing of the order as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-186, as amended by 2007 Conn. Acts 116, § 2 (Reg. Sess.).
|
|||||
| Gladstone v. Gladstone, FSTFA064009088S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Caterina W., W10CP06015022A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, JUVENILE MATTERS AT WILLIMANTIC, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mother's parental rights to her child were terminated, as termination was found to be in the child's best interest, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(2). The child was bonded with the maternal grandparents, who wished to adopt her and who met the child's day-to-day physical, emotional, moral, and educational needs.
|
|||||
| KFC Peeksill, Inc. v. Power Man, Inc., CV085013932S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD AT BRIDGEPORT, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wilful and wanton misconduct counts were stricken because they were devoid of any specific allegations of recklessness, or an extreme departure from ordinary care. Other tortious counts were not stricken because a party that was not sued was not a necessary party as the court was able to determine negligence issues without the party's presence.
|
|||||
| Northeast Tank & Envtl. Servs. v. TA Operating Corp., HHBCV065001541S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the foreclosure of mechanic's lien action the subcontractor was allowed a reasonable attorneys fee of $ 52,989 based upon 207.8 hours at an hourly rate of $ 255 as Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-249 authorized the allowance of attorneys fees in connection with the underlying action.
|
|||||
| Saffran v. Fairfield Equine Assocs., P.C., CV085004976S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY AT DANBURY, August 8, 2008, Decided, August 8, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for temporary injunction was granted as it was probable that horse's owner would prevail on claim that veterinarians were not authorized to dispose of horse since owner did not intend to abandon horse, and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-205a did not apply, as owner was adamant about horse's care and opposed euthanasia.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
