 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| All Pro Maids, Inc. v. Layton, Civil Action No. 058-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Request for prejudgment interest was denied where corporation did not ask for it in the complaint, in the pretrial order, or during the trial, and failed to present evidence in a way that provided notice that it sought prejudgment interest.
|
|||||
| Brenner v. Farrell, No. 237, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court abused its discretion by awarding a wife alimony beyond the 66-month statutory maximum where the ex-husband showed that he had been making post-divorce payments, which the trial court did not count.
|
|||||
| City of Dover v. Myers, C.A. No. 04C-10-049,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Earlier grant of appellant's request for a voluntary dismissal was vacated because appellee had already responded to the appeal and transferred it to the court for a jury trial. Appellee was not entitled to costs at an early stage of the proceedings.
|
|||||
| State v. Henderson, CRIMINAL ACTION NUMBERS IN-04-04-1104 & IN-04-04-1105, ID No. 0403013451,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although patdown of arrestee's companion by police who approached the arrestee and others in broad daylight as they left a Boys and Girls Club might have been permissible if the automatic companion rule applied under federal law, quantum of evidence supporting reasonable, articulable suspicion did not satisfy Del. Const. art. I, § 6.
|
|||||
| State v. Wilkerson, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Request that court order that defendant not be required to register as sex offender on ground that he was not informed of sex registration requirements at time of his plea was denied where requirements were collateral consequences to his guilty plea.
|
|||||
| Wall v. State, No. 212, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appeal rights with regard to his drug possession conviction when he entered a first offenders program, the waiver of his appeal rights was upheld.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
