LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - January 15, 2009

  
Alliance Data Sys. Corp. v. Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P., C.A. No. 3796-VCS, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 15, 2009, Decided, January 15, 2009, EFiled
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to dismiss a complaint was granted because a merger agreement did not require an investment fund to enter into an arrangement with a regulatory agency to gain approval of a merger, and a corporation could not resort to extrinsic evidence to manufacture contractual obligations that were clearly foreclosed by the unambiguous merger agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rubino v. State, No. 468, 2008, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Garden, I.D. No. 9912015068, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was denied because defense attorneys were not ineffective for failing to object to co-defendant's testimony on the ground that he perjured himself at defendant's trial when he denied being threatened by the police. Co-defendant's testimony was consistent with a voluntary statement he gave the police.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.