 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Auth Sausage Co. v. Dutch Oven II, Inc., Judgment Record No. 00J-10-099, Judgment Docket No. 1-19-078,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant who guaranteed a commercial note was granted his motion to vacate the tentative judgment against him as guarantor, because he had signed both the guarantee and credit agreement in a representative capacity.
|
|||||
| Eaton v. State, No. 553, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court's denial of appellant's application for counsel was clearly an interlocutory order, appellate court did not have jurisdiction over appeal of that order.
|
|||||
| Elam v. State, No. 70, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no error in the pretrial identification, because the police did not embellish their request that the complainant continue reviewing pictures, and they did not suggest that complainant's attacker was pictured in the mug shot books.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. 495, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of defendant's motion for postconviction relief was proper; defendant waived a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, and defendant was procedurally barred from arguing his sentence was outside the terms of a plea agreement.
|
|||||
| Riley v. Wilkins, Cr. A. No. 2000-05-004 Arbitration Case,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court analyzed the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, and found that the discovery date of the defect was a material question of fact. Therefore, summary judgement was not proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
