 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Warrington v. State, No. 41, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly denied defendant's motion for post-conviction relief under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61 as no merit to his alleged errors existed since he was not entitled to the appointment of counsel for the post-conviction proceeding and his other raised claims were procedurally barred for failure to have previously raised them.
|
|||||
| Warrington v. State, No. 34, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since evidentiary hearing revealed no factual basis for any of defendant's PCR claims, there was no good cause for appointment of counsel under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(e)(1); ineffective assistance claim did not show any prejudicial error by trial counsel; remaining claims were not raised below and were procedurally barred by Rule 61(i)(3).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
