 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cropper v. State, No. 200, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence for a jury to convict defendant of attempted first-degree murder, prior threat evidence was properly introduced, and defendant was correctly sentenced as a habitual offender.
|
|||||
| Garrett v. Virges, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 97C-02-249-RRC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury suit in which negligence was admitted, jury's damage award of one dollar to plaintiff shocked the court's conscience. The court ordered an additur of $ 3100.
|
|||||
| Greenbank Mill Assocs. v. New Castle County Bd. of Assessment Review & New Castle County, C.A. No. 98A-09-024-CG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In property tax case, appellee board committed an error by failing to consider whether appellant intended to use the property for the purpose of securing profit.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Brown, Civil Action No. 1998-08-106,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware commercial leases were interpreted by traditional contract principles; landlord had duty to prove damages by preponderance of evidence and to mitigate damages when possible.
|
|||||
| Local Union No. 626 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. Pension Fund v. Wynwood of New Castle, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 98L-08-028-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' failure to name defendant property owner as a party in mechanics' lien action was a fatal defect in the complaint, so that the action as to the property owner and defendant general contractor had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| Nichols v. State, No. 333, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant admitted to using drugs while on probation and the trial court carefully considered the appropriate sentence for the probation violation, it was within its discretion in revoking his probation.
|
|||||
| Sellers v. Colonial Ins. Co., C.A. No. 98C-06-300-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's claim that defendant never verbally informed her about anti-stacking provisions in the automobile insurance policy it sold her failed to create an issue of fact sufficient to deny defendant summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Track & Trail v. Conran, C.A. No. 98A-12-004 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Industrial Accident Board hearing officer did not err in finding testimony of injured employee's chiropractor uncontroverted because officer had discretion to evaluate credibility of independent medical expert's zero permanency rating.
|
|||||
| Wilmington Country Club v. Cowee, No. 51, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In negligence action, no error in finding defendant negligent for not warning plaintiff of existence of intersection; however, trial court erred in not computing interest from date of first jury trial verdict.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
