 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bishoff v. Troyer, C.A. No. 98-10-0083,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, KENT, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court entered judgment in favor of the owners of a home in a negligence action against a subcontractor; the evidence presented, including expert testimony, proved that the subcontractor was negligent in installing a fireplace.
|
|||||
| Gov't Tech. Servs. v. Optional Sys. Res., C.A. No. 98C-09-203-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 23, 2001, Submitted
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was granted in favor of the seller where there was a total lack of evidence that the computer servers purchased by the buyer and shipped to its customer were damaged at the time of arrival.
|
|||||
| In re Dorsey, No. 573, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's request for a writ of prohibition to prevent a retrial was dismissed, since he failed to prove that the retrial exceeded the trial court's jurisdiction, or that the remedy of appeal was inadequate or incomplete.
|
|||||
| Owens v. State, Superior Court Action No. 9909007522,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant received the substance of the police officer's notes regarding defendant's DUI arrest in the form of a formal report, State's failure to provide the officer's notes to defendant before trial did not violate the discovery rules.
|
|||||
| Pinkett v. Barrett Bus. Servs., Civil Action No. 00A-07-001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unemployment benefits were properly denied, because, without substantiation that employee could not work due to carpal tunnel syndrome, she failed to establish that she was not reasonably fitted for the offered job.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Brady v. Wellington Homes, Inc., C.A. No. 99C-09-168 - JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A negligent misrepresentation of material fact could be sufficient to violate a deceptive trade practices statute, regardless of whether a consumer relied upon the misrepresentation or not.
|
|||||
| State v. Jackson, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On his second attempt at request for post-conviction relief, Delaware petitioner again failed to provide more than conclusory and incredible allegations attacking counsel's effectiveness.
|
|||||
| Swann Keys Civic Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment, Civil Action No. 99A-12-004,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, January 23, 2001, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied respondent individual's motion for reargument of the reversal of a decision by respondent board; the court's determination that petitioner had standing to challenge the decision was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Wolfson v. Supermarkets General Holdings Corp., C.A. No. 17047,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 23, 2001, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed preferred shareholder's motion to enforce settlement agreement reallocating more merger proceeds to preferred shares. The settlement agreement did not require the acquirer to tender-offer after exercising walk away rights.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
