 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| DeLucca v. KKAT Mgmt., C.A. No. 1384-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employee was entitled to advancement of legal fees in underlying breach of fiduciary and contractual obligations action filed against her by affiliates of limited liability companies. All of claims accused the former employee of misconduct during office hours, and broad terms of advancement provision clearly applied to such claims.
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. State, No. 235, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a first degree robbery case, defendant's complaint that a State's witness testified falsely was without merit as it was based on alleged inconsistencies and vagaries in the witness's testimony, and there was no evidence that the jury did not properly carry out its responsibility in resolving any conflicts in the testimony.
|
|||||
| Izquierdo v. Sills, C.A. No. 15505-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer was entitled to judgment in his action against a city challenging his punishment for misconduct in line of duty because complaint hearing board convened more than 30 days after conclusion of investigation. In so doing, it violated officer's contractual rights to a hearing within 30 days, as required by Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 9204.
|
|||||
| Prospero v. Christiana Care Health Servs., C. A. No. 05C-11-149-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical expert's affidavit indicating that the expert was fully qualified to express an opinion and further opining that hospital's negligence caused patient's injuries complied with Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 6853.
|
|||||
| Providence Creek Acad. Charter Sch., Inc. v. St. Joseph's at Providence Creek, C.A.No. 1210-K,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cancellation, pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, § 1608, of the notice of lis pendens lodged by the tenant was granted. The tenant was not entitled to a resulting trust based on a joint venture, as the lease between the parties and its amendments did not establish a joint venture and, in fact, were inconsistent with the notion of a joint venture.
|
|||||
| Walton v. Beale, Civil Action No. 19749,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyer of real property was granted judgment in his suit against the sellers of the property for specific performance because the buyer's partial performance of the oral agreement between the parties, when combined with the unambiguous nature of the oral agreement, justified an exception to the statute of frauds under Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 2714.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
