LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - January 31, 2006

  
Nye v. Univ. of Del., No. 315, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a dean's widow sued a university for failing to renew his appointment, the university's alleged failure to follow written procedures did not support a viable claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, absent a showing of bad faith or ill will, which the widow failed to make.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pestex, Inc. v. Sabo, No. 132, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Walker, Cr. I.D. No. 0405000068, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wit Capital Group, Inc. v. Benning, No. 568, 2004, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In customers' suit against a brokerage firm, as they could not show that the "injury-in-fact" requirement under New York law existed on a class-wide basis, they could not satisfy the "predominance of common issues of law or fact" requirement under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). Therefore, the trial court erred in certifying four sub-classes.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.