 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hintmann v. Fred Weber, Inc., C.A. No. 12839,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court accepted with some exceptions the special master's recommendations for resolution of issues in action by petitioner shareholders who voted against merger and elected appraisal of their shares.
|
|||||
| Jamieson v. GMC, C.A. No. 99A-06-13 JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was not entitled to partial disability benefits under workers' compensation for lost overtime during light duty work period after work-related injury; employer's overtime equalization policy was his only remedy.
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 4, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion was denied as the same contentions had been fully adjudicated in a prior motion for postconviction relief, and to the extent not raised or adjudicated, consideration of the claims were barred as not in the interest of justice.
|
|||||
| State v. Denston, C.A. No. 00M-03-010; Cr.A. No. 9905011124,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Trader v. Wilson, C.A. No. 99-01-042, C.A. No. 99-05-016,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A debtor's motion to consolidate was properly denied; the original action to recover on two promissory notes and the debtor's action against the creditor's husband involved a different factual situation and different principles of law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
