 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriott Hotels Props. II Ltd. Pshp. Unitholders Litig., Consolidated Civil Action No. 14961,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 24, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the general partner was under no fiduciary duty to protect the limited partners from the offer, further discovery was necessary to determine whether the general partner acted disloyally in limiting distributions.
|
|||||
| Outdoor Techs. v. Allfirst Fin., C.A. No. 99C-09-151 WTQ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 24, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A plaintiff did not have third-party beneficiary standing where there was no contract between a bank and another business to handle payments; but claims of fraud, misrepresentation and conspiracy survived motions to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Przybylski v. Pienkowski, No. 90, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Slade v. State, No. 45, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, January 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to accept a defendant's plea when he changed his mind about the State's plea agreement during jury selection (after the deadline of the final case review).
|
|||||
| Strassburger v. Earley, C.A. No. 14267,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, January 24, 2000, Date Issued
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The use of corporate assets to repurchase stock for the purpose of preserving majority control in one director was subject to an entire fairness standard of review and under this standard was found to be improper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
