 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Flonnory v. State, No. 358, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's statements to his brother, which the brother quoted to the police during a videotaped interrogation, were hearsay within hearsay under Del. R. Evid. 801(2)(A) and admissible under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 3507, in defendant's trial for first degree murder.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Del. v. New Castle County Dep't of Fin., C.A. No. 05A-06-009,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County Board of Assessment Review, as an inferior body, could not impose a deadline resulting in a forfeiture of the rights expressly conferred in both Del. Const. art. VIII, § I, as amended by 58 Del. Laws, 67 (1971), and Del. Code Ann. tit. 9, § 8103. Thus, a university remained entitled to a tax exemption of certain educational property.
|
|||||
| Vague v. Bank One Corp., C.A. No. 18741,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 1, 2006, Decided , February 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bank was granted judgment in a former employee's suit to compel the bank to honor the employee's exercise of stock options in the bank as the employee failed to timely exercise the stock options according to agreements. Further, the employee failed to show a misrepresentation by the bank as to the exercise dates or justifiable reliance on his part.
|
|||||
| Fields v. Kent County, C.A. No. 1096-K,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted to property owners in an action challenging zoning decisions; the owners' motion to amend the complaint was allowable under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 15, and the county's act of approving zoning changes by resolution was a clear violation of Del. Code Ann. tit. 9, § 4110.
|
|||||
| Graves v. State, I.D. No. 0411021298,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of driving a vehicle while license revoked, in violation of Del. Code Ann. tit. 21, § 2756, was affirmed because the trial court properly admitted faxed copies of defendant's driving record into evidence as the rules of evidence did not require that the State present a certified copy of the records.
|
|||||
| Condon v. Neighborcare, Inc., C.A. No. 05C-04-005,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Second of two cases, alleging medical malpractice, was dismissed as time-barred as (1) the filing of the first case alleging wrongful death did not toll the statute of limitations on the second and (2) the statute of limitations on the second case had already run. Thus, nothing, including a notice of intent to investigate, tolled the statute.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Kraft Foods, No. 426, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
