 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Tenenbaum, No. 565, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No statutes of limitation applied to a professional disciplinary proceeding and, therefore, no basis exists in such proceedings to assert the affirmative defense of laches. In such a proceeding, an attorney was disbarred as a result of engaging in a pattern of sexual misconduct with his female clients for more than two decades.
|
|||||
| In re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consol. S'holder Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 1106-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a challenge to corporate transactions, plaintiffs demonstrated equitable tolling and fraudulent concealment tolled the statute of limitations, Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 8106. Plaintiffs alleged defendants knowingly "spring-loaded" options to executives and directors while maintaining in public that such options were issued at market rates.
|
|||||
| Ryan v. Gifford, Civil Action No. 2213-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shareholder provided sufficient particularity in his complaint in a derivative action for backdated options to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to make demand under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 23.1. However, he lacked standing under Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 327 to assert claims for transactions arising before he became a shareholder by way of a merger.
|
|||||
| Virdin v. State, No. 463, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Wilson, C.A. No. 04C-03-031 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: With respect to plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents in defendant's underlying matter, a trial court, through a commissioner, required defendant to disclose certain specified documents; the remainder were not ordered disclosed and a protective order pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 26(c) was granted in defendant's favor.
|
|||||
| State v. Jackson, I.D. NO: 0602014308,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant had been removed involuntarily from the place where he could make a threshold refusal, and because defendant clearly refused to consent to a search of the residence, a warrantless search of the residence was unreasonable; accordingly, all evidence of the alleged drug paraphernalia found in the residence had to be suppressed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
