|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - February 8 - February 12, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Perlegos v. Atmel Corp., C.A. No. 2320-N, C.A. No. 2321-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Terminated officers of a company were denied reinstatement under Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 225 because their terminations fell within the proper scope of a validly created special committee, those who served on the committee did not suffer from disabling conflicts of interest, and the decisions were the product of a fair and reasonable process.
|
|
| |
Pollard-Marcus v. Forcucci, C.A. No. 06C-02-012-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Injured party's motion for new trial or, in alternative, for additur under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 59, was denied because evidence supported the jury's finding that the injured party was less than candid; among other things, the court noted that when contrary to her personal injury claims, injured party took issue with her treating providers.
|
|
| |
Sigismondi v. Hall, C.A. No. 05C-05-011 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although there was a factual dispute, a treating physician's testimony concerning a patient's low back and ankle injuries was relevant, reliable, and admissible under Del. R. Evid. 702 and Daubert; because the jury would be the ultimate fact finders concerning the factual disputes presented, the defendant's motion in limine was denied.
|
|
| |
Option One Mortg. Corp. v. Diamicis, C.A. No: 06L-03-024J-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A mortgagor was not entitled to vacate or stay the confirmation of a sheriff's sale of her property, after she defaulted on its mortgage, because the irregularity in the sale, when the successful bidder balked at depositing the full purchase price, did not prejudice the mortgagor, and the mortgagor was not equitably entitled to set the sale aside.
|
|
| |
Boscov's Dep't Store v. Jackson, C.A. 06A-06-001 RBY,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Delaware Human Rights Commission properly determined that a department store violated Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 4504(a) by cancelling classes appellees were scheduled to teach based on their involvement, or perceived involvement, with the religions of Wicca and Paganism, because appellees were members of a protected class based on their creed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|