 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re $ 2,157.00 in United States Currency, S08M-12-002 ABH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A currency owner's motion to dismiss the State's application for the forfeiture of currency seized from the owner was denied because the owner received proper notice of the forfeiture, pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 71.3, as the notice referred to complete information regarding challenging the forfeiture, and he failed to timely contest it.
|
|||||
| Richardson v. State, No. 238, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Brice, I.D. # 0107007736,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Summers v. State, No. 607, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 25, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Adjile, Inc. v. City of Wilmington, No. 514, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carnevale v. State, I.D. Nos.: 0708000019CLS, 0707008310CLS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lutz v. Lancaster Pike Stuart, LLC, C. A. No.: 07C-07-041 CLS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rohm & Haas Co. v. Dow Chem. Co., Civil Action No. 4309-CC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A financial model that was created for purposes of litigation support and settlement analysis was protected from disclosure upon a determination that it was attorney work product pursuant to Del. Ch. Ct. R. 26(b)(3); there was no showing of substantial need or an inability to obtain a substantial equivalent without undue hardship.
|
|||||
| State v. Brice, I.D. # 0107007736,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 26, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's request for postconviction relief was summarily dismissed where it was procedurally barred under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(1); the retroactive right based on a precedent that revised the interpretation of Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 636(a)(2) was not applicable because it was decided prior to the inmate's entry of a guilty plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
